Legal Opinion

Flaig v. Gramm

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1999No. 99-057PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶ 1 Benj amin and Verna Flaig (hereafter the Flaigs) appeal the judgment and order of the Twentieth Judicial District Court.

¶2 We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶3 We restate the issues as follows:

¶4 1. Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Flaigs have neither an easement by estoppel or implication nor an equitable servitude upon the Gramms’ property.

¶5 2. Whether the District Court erred in finding that the Flaigs’ breach of the well agreement was material.

Standard of Review

¶6 We review a district court’s conclusions of law to determine whether they are correct. Steer,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Thisted v. Country Club Tower Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ducham v. TumaMontana Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Norwood v. Service Distributing, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Estate of Gleason v. Central United Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Brandt v. R&R Mtn. Esc.Montana Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Fenwick v. State, Department of Military Affairs, Disaster & Emergency Services DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API