Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Barnum

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1984No. 84-012PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Defendant Edwin Barnum appeals from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Lake County, finding a prescriptive easement across his property in favor of plaintiffs, and enjoining him from obstructing plaintiffs’ use of the easement. We affirm.

In dispute is the right to use without permission or obstruction a dirt and gravel road running north from the Lake Mary Ronan Highway through lands owned by plaintiffs Gary and Phillip Thomas and continuing through the property of Edwin Barnum. The road then enters the property owned by Jerome and Ruth Thomas, and continues in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Glantz v. GabelMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Scott v. WeinheimerMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Taylor v. PetranekMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rathbun v. RobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Keebler v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Woods v. HouleMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rappold v. DurocherMontana Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API