Legal Opinion

Musselshell Valley Farming & Livestock Co. v. Cooley

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1929No. 6,523PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

Many years ago, Handel Brothers, predecessors in interest of the plaintiff, and Cooley and Weaver, predecessors in interest of the defendants, were living upon lands which they owned in the valley of the Musselshell. Handel Brothers, intending to take out a ditch from the river to irrigate their lands, posted a notice at the intended point of diversion on November 14, 1891, and within twenty days thereafter filed with the county clerk of the proper county a notice of the appropriation, in which they claimed 2,000 inches of water. Work upon the ditch was commenced immediately, and it was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bailey v. TintingerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Murray v. TingleyMontana Supreme Court · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rumph v. Dale Edwards, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ophus v. FritzMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Missoula Light & Water Co. v. HughesMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. 79 Ranch, Inc. v. PitschMontana Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API