Connolly v. Harrel
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson
Plaintiff brought this action against the defendants to have adjudicated, as between the parties, the waters of “Skidoo” or “Hell Roaring” Creek, in Lake county. The court entered a decree awarding the defendant Rosenberger and the defendant H. E. Harrel each an appropriation of 40 inches, or approximately 1 cubic foot per second of time, of the waters of this creek, and adjudged that these appropriations were prior in point of time to any appropriation of the plaintiff from the same stream. The appeal is from the judgment.
Defendant H. E. Harrel initiated and completed an appropriation from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Prentice v. McKayMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- MacLay v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mildenberger v. GalbraithMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Osnes Livestock Co. v. WarrenMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Cook v. HudsonMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Roland v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Clausen v. ArmingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.