Legal Opinion

In re Speights

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2017No. 16-BG-1017Published

1Opinion of the Court

' Per Curiam:

Respondent Nathaniel H. Speights takes exception to the appended report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility. The Board adopts the findings and conclusions of its Ad Hoc Hearing Committee that respondent mishandled and neglected a personal injury action he filed in 'the United States District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania on behalf of a client who sustained severe injuries in a downhill skiing race accident. Agreeing with the Hearing Committee’s determination that respondent’s errors and omissions clearly and convincingly demonstrate -his.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API