State v. Miller

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of :heft in the first degree. At sentencing the judge ordered restitution to the victim in the amount of ¡54,964, but he failed to schedule the payments pursuant to ORS 161.675(1). On appeal, this court renanded the case for resentencing to correct that error. State v. Miller, 37 Or App 108, 586 P2d 122 (1978). At ■esentencing the court did set up a schedule for repaynent and also purportedly imposed additional restituion in the amount of $450 for the expenses incurred oy the county in providing defendant’s court-appointed :ounsel. On appeal…