Legal Opinion
Singh v. Clinton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2010No. 09-15672PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns the notice required by statute before the State Department could terminate an immigrant visa registration for failure to file a timely application. Sukhwinder and Dharam Singh (collectively “the Singhs”) challenge the termination of Sukhwinder’s visa registration. The State Department terminated Sukhwinder’s visa registration for failure to apply within one year of notice of eligibility, but the Singhs contend that the indirect notice provided was inadequate under section 203(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(g).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Patel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Laura Luis Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- High Sierra Hikers Association v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jerrid Allen v. Kevin MilasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Munoz v. MabusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- ASSE International, Inc. v. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Samirah v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Jane Doe 1 v. NielsenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.