Legal Opinion

Patel v. Reno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1997No. 96-55359PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

The Patel family’s visa application has been pending before the United States Consulate in Bombay, India for eight years without action. The Patels filed this mandamus action to force the consulate to make a decision. Because we agree that the applicable regulations require the consulate to act, we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment. We affirm the district court’s issuance of summary judgment as to non-consulate parties who are without any power to issue visas.

I

Mohanbhai Patel, a naturalized United States citizen, seeks visas for his wife and her two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Li Hing of Hong Kong, Inc., and Yee Lee Soon v. Burton Levin, Counsel General of the United States of America for Hong KongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Antonio Ventura-Escamilla and Rosa Maria Martinez De Ventura v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Ramon Azurin Gregorio Araneta v. William Von Raab, in His Capacity as Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Richard Mulligan v. George Schultz, Secretary of State, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Jerrid Allen v. Kevin MilasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Matushkina v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Jeffrey Plaskett v. Christine WormuthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API