Legal Opinion
Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2006No. 03-73930PublishedCited by 186 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Pedro Garcia-Quintero petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA” or “Board”) order that found him removable for alien smuggling, and ineligible for cancellation of removal due to his failure to accrue seven years of continuous residence in the United States after being “admitted in any status.” At the removal hearing, Garcia-Quintero’s counsel attempted to assert the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination on behalf of Garcia-Quintero. The immigration judge (“IJ”), however, required Garcia-Quintero to assert his Fifth Amendment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Todor Krumov Simeonov v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- Santos-Lemus v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Barker v. Riverside County Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Barrios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.