Halling v. Employment Division

*459EDMONDS, J.

The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) held that, because claimant’s discharge was for “misconduct connected with his work,” he is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. ORS 657.176(2)(a); OAR 471-30-038(3). Claimant seeks review, and we affirm.

EAB adopted the referee’s finding, in part:

“(1) The claimant worked for the employer from August 25, 1987, until April 9, 1990. (2) For at least the last two years, he was the manager. (3) As manager, he frequently made schedule changes. (4) The owner was usually aware of the changes and approved them.

“(5) On March 26,1990, the…