Legal Opinion

MacKillop v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 31, 2001No. EAB 99-AB-1556; CA A108174PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the state Employment Appeals Board (the Board), in which the Board held that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation because she was discharged from her employment for misconduct. ORS 657.176(2). The Board concluded that the conduct that resulted in petitioner’s discharge was not an isolated instance of poor judgment under OAR 471-030-0038(3), such as would exempt her from disqualification. We remand for reconsideration.

The Board made the following findings. Petitioner was hired by employer Fred Meyer on May 16,1998. She held a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Goodwin v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Perez v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Waters v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Linville v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API