Legal Opinion

Pinckney v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 14, 2009No. 06-803CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

I. Background

On November 13, 2008 the court issued an order stating the following:

On Thursday, November 13, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST), the court held a Telephonic Status Conference (TSC) with the parties. At the TSC the court reviewed the exhibit lists with the parties. Further to the TSC, the court will not retain [sic; “retain” should read “receive”] testimony or exhibits at trial to the extent such testimony or exhibits relate to contracts in force prior to the contract at issue in this dispute. The documents affected by this ruling are Joint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Froudi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Henderson County Drainage District No. 3 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Pinckney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Bhb Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. John Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API