Legal Opinion
Austin v. Arkansas State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 10, 1995No. 94-997PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
The appellants, William and Deborah Austin, purchased a tract of land on the outskirts, but within the city limits, of Paragould. The property is bounded on the west side by Highway 49 and the other three sides are bordered by property owned by different owners. The Austins had the property rezoned for commercial use.
A dispute resulted between the Austins and appellee Arkansas State Highway Commission when the Commission worked on a Highway 49 bridge located just north of the Austins’ property. Apparently, without notice to the Austins, the Commission’s bridge crew extended…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fireman's Insurance v. Arkansas State Claims CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pennington Seed, Inc. v. Produce Exchange No. 299Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- STATE DEPT. OF FIN. AND ADMIN. v. StatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha MarketingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Suneson v. Holloway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Duit Construction Co v. Arkansas State Claims CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.