Legal Opinion

Suneson v. Holloway Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1999No. 98-846PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This appeal is a tort case involving a legal principle of major importance called the “accepted-work doctrine.” One of Craig Suneson’s points for reversal is that the doctrine is outdated and that this court should repudiate it. Our court has jurisdiction of this appeal under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(b)(5).

The facts leading to Suneson’s accident and injuries and to the filing of this case are largely undisputed. At approximately 5:40 a.m. on February 24, 1992, Suneson was driving a tractor-trailer north on Highway 71 near Bentonville in heavy fog. He was driving in the outside…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Hunt v. BlasiusIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Strakos v. GehringTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Saylor v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  5. Helen Hanna, Cicero Hanna v. Annie C. Fletcher, Trustee of Estate of Florence Johnson, Benjamin F. Fletcher, and Fred S. Gichner Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peters v. ForsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Marlar v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Smith v. Rogers Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Washington v. Qwest Communications Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. DAVID M. WEBBER, PLAINTIFF—APPELLANT v. BRANDY L. SOBBA, DEFENDANT—APPELLEE, STATE AUTO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API