Legal Opinion

Pennington Seed, Inc. v. Produce Exchange No. 299

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 9, 2006No. 2005-1440PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.

Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Pennington Seed, Inc. and AgResearch Limited (collectively “Pennington”), the patentees, originally filed suit against the University of Arkansas (“the University”)1 for infringement and conversion of U.S. Patent No. 6,111,170 (“the 170 patent”). The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri dismissed the Original Complaint due to the University’s Eleventh Amendment immunity. Pennington Seed, Inc. v. Produce Exch. No. 299, No. 04-4194-CV-C…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Autogenomics, Inc. v. Oxford Gene Technology Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Synthes v. G.M. Dos Reis Jr. Ind. Com. De Equip. MedicoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Micron Technology, Inc. v. Mosaid Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API