Legal Opinion

STATE DEPT. OF FIN. AND ADMIN. v. Staton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1996No. 96-215PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT H. Dudley, Justice.

In January 1994, Debora Staton purchased a car and an extended service contract on the car and paid State sales tax on the sale of both the car and the service contract. The State sales tax attributable to the service contract was $49.28. On April 21, 1994, Ms. Staton filed a claim with the Department of Finance and Administration for refund of the $49.28 on the ground that, under the language of the sales-tax statute, the tax did not apply to the extended service contract. The Department denied the refund.

On July 7, 1994, Ms. Staton filed suit in chancery court and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Pitcock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Hercules Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Pledger v. BosnickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. County of Searcy v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS v. MATTHEW ANDREWSSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Cross v. Arkansas Livestock & Poultry CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API