Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Hammond

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1937No. Crim. 1596PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The application of the above-named petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus has been heard and the cause submitted for our consideration. The petition shows that on or about the 7th day of May, 1917, an information was filed in the Superior Court of Fresno County, charging that the petitioner and one other did, on or about the 30th day of March, 1917, in the county of Fresno, state of California, wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and with premeditation and malice aforethought, kill and murder Faustin Lassare, a human being.

Upon being arraigned the petitioner, in the first instance, entered a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ParaskevopolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. BayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. In Re StroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Nieves González v. JonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API