Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Stroff

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1933No. Docket No. 1265PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner was convicted of the crime of burglary upon an information duly filed in the superior court by the district attorney of Humboldt County pursuant to the provisions of section 809 of the Penal Code. The information charged the accused with “wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and burglariously entering that certain store building known as Brizard Store . . . with the felonious intent then and ■there to commit the crime of theft”. His cause was regularly 'set for trial on September 4, 1928. He duly waived the right to be represented by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Ex parte McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. In Re HeinzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. FryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API