Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Sisco Group, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2003No. S-10266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Reynolds tried to execute on a money judgment against Sisson by seizing one of three vans Sisson had fraudulently transferred to a friend, Erickson, and by attaching funds owed by a third person, Frye, to whom Erickson had sold the other two vans after receiving them from Sisson. As Reynolds prepared to sell the seized van and either shortly before or after he attached the funds from the other vansg' sale, Sisson died. Alaska's probate code bans judgment creditors from attempting new executions or levies against any property of a deceased judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sheehan v. Estate of GambergAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Goldstein v. PrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Hoesly v. HoganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lundgren v. GaudianeAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Maldonado v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Alaska USA Federal Credit Union v. The Sayer Law Group, P.C.; State of Alaska, Department of Revenue, Child Support Services Division; Janelle Earls, in her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Department of Revenue; Troy R. Lewis; and Shanda M. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
  3. In Re TinkessUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API