Legal Opinion
Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 21, 2006No. 3:06 CV 7029PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZOUHARY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 20), to which Plaintiffs filed a Memorandum in Opposition (Doc. No. 31), and Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. No. 33). The Court has jurisdiction to decide this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Backgrovnd
Plaintiffs David Tullís and Michael Mack are two medical doctors who maintained pension funds through the Toledo Clinic Employees’ 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the Plan), an ERISA-governed pension plan. Defendant UMB Bank, N.A., was the Trustee for the Plan.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hollowell v. Cincinnati Ventilating Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Afridi v. National City BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Tullis v. UMB BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008