Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant UMB Bank, N.A.’s (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 95). Plaintiffs Drs. Mack and Tullís (“Plaintiffs”) filed a response and cross-motion for summary judgment on May 20, 2009 (Doc. 98) and Defendant filed a reply on June 10, 2009. (Doc. 104). The Court has jurisdiction under § 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (e, f) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is denied (Doc. 98), and Defendant’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rogers v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Chesemore v. Alliance Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Chesemore v. Alliance Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2011
- Johnson v. NFL Player Disability, Neurocognitive & Death Benefit PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- McMaken v. GreatBanc Trust CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019