Legal Opinion
Jan Gerritsen and Johannes C.J. Aerts v. Shoji Shirai, Masakzu Fukushima, Satoru Miyamoto and Masahiro Miyazaki
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 19, 1992No. 91-1480PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Jan Gerritsen and Johannes C. J. Aerts are the named inventors in United States Patent No. RE 33,592 (the RE ’592 patent), which is directed to a color display tube comprising an in-line electron gun. Gerrit-sen and Aerts appeal that portion of the August 6, 1991 decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Interference No. 102,103, concluding that they did not comply with 37 C.F.R. § 1.662(b) (1991) and that as a sanction they are not entitled to claims 10-22 of the RE '592 patent. Because we agree…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. EDO Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Cooper Technologies Co. v. DudasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Board of Regents of the University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Sterling Federal Systems, Inc. v. Daniel S. Goldin, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Shu-Hui Chen and Vittorio Farina v. Herve Bouchard, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain CommerconCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.