Legal Opinion
Societe Anonyme Marne Et Champagne v. Roger L. Myers
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 13, 1957No. Patent Appeal 6311PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents acting for the Commissioner and affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, 109 U.S.P.Q. 316, who thereby dismissed appellant’s opposition to appellee’s application for the registration of “Monopoles Alfred Rothschild” as a trademark for wines. The application was filed July 20, 1953 and alleges therein first use of the mark in commerce among the several states on May 23, 1953. Opposer claims use in the United States since 1937 of “A. Rothschild & Cie” also for wines.
The procedure in the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Clinton Detergent Company v. The Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Sanyo Watch Co., Inc. v. Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Clark Equipment Company v. Baker-Lull Corporation (Otis Elevator Company, Alleged Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Schenley Industries, Inc. v. E. Martinoni Company, Joseph S. Finch and Company v. E. Martinoni CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Hood River Distillers, Inc. v. Roger Louis Myers, D.B.A. Monopoles Alfred RothschildCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964