Legal Opinion
McConnell v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.
This is an action to recover first-party benefits reimbursing the plaintiff for basic economic loss arising from personal -injuries alleged to have" been caused by a motor vehicle. (See Insurance Law, art. XVIII, Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act, the new “ no-fault ” law.) Both sides have moved for summary judgment. The facts are undisputed.
Josephine Pantola had parked her automobile for the night on the street in front of her house in the Village of New York Mills. She was in the house, the car was unoccupied. It was insured with no-fault coverage by the defendant. At 11…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Feitelberg v. MatusonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1925
- People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Landolphi v. WilhelmsenNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Lynton v. MetcalfCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perkins v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Thomas v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Arbella Mutual Insurance v. VynoriousMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Yanis v. Texaco, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Perkins v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.