Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Travelers Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. Callahan, J.
Defendant, the Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers), has moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a]) for judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint on the *137ground, that it (Travelers) has a defense founded upon documentary evidence (E. B. T.) and further on the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff opposes his carrier’s (Travelers) motion and seeks an order granting judgment against Travelers or the Allstate Insurance Co. (Allstate), a codefendant.
It is apparent that defendants (insurance companies) desire a declaration as to the definition of a "user” under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McConnell v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Katz v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1952
- McConnell v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Cucinella v. CooperNew York Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rose v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Thomas v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Colon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Fleming v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.