Legal Opinion

Arbella Mutual Insurance v. Vynorious

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 5, 1993No. 92-P-1090PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

This appeal raises the issue whether a snowmobile is a motor vehicle for purposes of compulsory uninsured motorist coverage. We conclude that it is not, except possibly when it is being used on a public way.

The material facts are not in dispute. On January 13, 1990, Larry Vynorious, a resident of Massachusetts, was standing on a snowmobile trail in Maine when he was struck by a snowmobile being driven by a person who carried no liability insurance covering the operation of that vehicle. Vynorious had purchased a standard Massachusetts automobile insurance policy from Arbella Mutual Insurance…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Surrey v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Hartford Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hein-Werner Corp. v. Jackson Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Frank v. Wisconsin Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. MacLean v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Deere & Co. v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Carey's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API