Legal Opinion
Feitelberg v. Matuson
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided March 23, 1925PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Spiegelberg, J.:
It is conceded that the defendant permitted one Mishkin to use his car. The accident occurred on October 25, 1924, while Mishkin and some of his friends occupied the car. The driver was not Mishkin but one of his party.
*596If the cause of action had occurred prior to July 1, 1924, this action could not have been maintained. On that day chapter 534 of the Laws of 1924, which .added section 282-e to the Highway Law, went into effect. That statute, so far as applicable, reads: “ Negligence of operator other than owner attributable to owner. Every owner of. a mptor vehicle operated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Griffin v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Daugherty v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Witherstine v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McConnell v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Sutton v. TangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.