Legal Opinion

Brown v. Domestic Utilities Manufacturing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1916No. L. A. No. 3377. In BankPublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.-

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

A hearing before this court in the matter of the above appeal was ordered, after decision- by the district court of appeal of the second appellate district, reversing the judgment of the trial court which was in favor of the plaintiffs.

The frauds perpetrated by defendants and appellants upon these plaintiffs, which frauds were established by the evidence and found by the court, were so gross that equity would lend all of its legitimate powers to relieve plaintiffs from the effect of them. It was because the trial court had decreed that such relief should be granted and the court of appeals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hammond v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Burkle v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McGue v. RommelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estrada v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Davis v. Rite-Lite Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McNeese v. McNeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Zeller v. MilliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Clanton v. ClantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API