Legal Opinion

Ryals v. Garza

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1953No. 14751PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

This is a garnishment suit after judgment instituted by appellee E. De La Garza, judgment creditor of FI. T. Ryals, against Mercantile National Bank, Garnishee, and Phil Grem, Garnishee. Mrs. Sue Milligan Ryals, appellant, joined by her husband IT. T. Ryals, intervened, alleging that funds in the Bank in two accounts were her separate property, hence not subject to garnishment to pay the judgment against her husband. After a trial before the court without a jury judgment was rendered for appellee against the Bank as garnishee for $971.62 and against Grem as garnishee for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North East Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. DicksonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ralls v. RallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Tanner v. DrakeTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Young v. FittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Taylor v. Suloch Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolin Oil Company v. StaplesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Holt v. City National Bank of BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Ryals v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API