Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Justice.
This suit originated in an action by appellants, Bourdon Rea Barfield as Trustee for the children of his brother, Oliver Eakle Barfield; the latter as Trustee for Bourdon Rea Barfield’s children; and the parents of the two named trustees against appellee, Howard M. Smith Company, a retail clothing store corporation, seeking recovery of $32,800 allegedly due under a lease agreement between the parties. They will hereinafter be referred to as the Barfields and Smiths or appellants and appellee or by their respective names.
The lease agreement out of which the present controversy…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Woodward v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Hexter v. PrattTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of AmarilloTexas Supreme Court · 1968