Legal Opinion

Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1967No. 7711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, Justice.

This suit originated in an action by appellants, Bourdon Rea Barfield as Trustee for the children of his brother, Oliver Eakle Barfield; the latter as Trustee for Bourdon Rea Barfield’s children; and the parents of the two named trustees against appellee, Howard M. Smith Company, a retail clothing store corporation, seeking recovery of $32,800 allegedly due under a lease agreement between the parties. They will hereinafter be referred to as the Barfields and Smiths or appellants and appellee or by their respective names.

The lease agreement out of which the present controversy…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Woodward v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hexter v. PrattTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of AmarilloTexas Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API