Legal Opinion

Gold Kist, Inc. v. Baker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1999No. 1971422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole issue presented in this case is whether an arbitration agreement signed by an employee of a company that is engaged in interstate commerce is enforceable under the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), in view of the language in the FAA stating that "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce" are exempt from the provisions of the FAA. See 9 U.S.C. § 1. We hold that the contract here involved is governed by the FAA. We reverse the judgment of the trial court holding otherwise and remand…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ex Parte Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Allied-Bruce v. DobsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. DELTA CONST. CORP. v. GoodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. GADSDEN BUDWEISER DISTRIB. COMPANY INC. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Gold Kist, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API