Legal Opinion
Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Douglas
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 8, 2002No. 1000683PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Liberty National Life Insurance Company is the defendant in a retaliatory-discharge action filed by Bridgette Douglas. Liberty National appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion to stay judicial proceedings in that action pending arbitration. We affirm.
I
Liberty National hired Douglas as an insurance agent in February 1998. Her duties included selling life-insurance policies to new clients and servicing Liberty National's existing clients in south Alabama. On February 16, 1998, shortly before she was hired, Douglas and a representative of Liberty National executed a document…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- TranSouth Financial Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Sisters of Visitation v. COCHRAN PLASTERING CO. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. VintsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Tefco Finance Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ameriquest Mortg. Co., Inc. v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Potts v. Baptist Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Lewis v. OakleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Johnson v. Jefferson County Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.