Legal Opinion

Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 8, 2002No. 1000683Published

1Opinion of the Court

826 So.2d 806 (2002)

LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

v.

Bridgette DOUGLAS.

1000683.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 8, 2002.

William P. Cobb II and J. Beth Moscarelli of Balch & Bingham, L.L.P., Montgomery, for appellant.

Benton H. Persons, Andalusia, for appellee.

LYONS, Justice.

Liberty National Life Insurance Company is the defendant in a retaliatory-discharge action filed by Bridgette Douglas. Liberty National appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion to stay judicial proceedings in that action pending arbitration. We affirm.

I

Liberty National hired Douglas as an insurance…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API