Legal Opinion
Allied-Bruce v. Dobson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 3, 1995No. 1920473PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States
This cause is on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. The question is whether the Federal Arbitration Act ("the Act") requires arbitration of the claims at issue.
The original opinion of this Court is published at628 So.2d 354. The essential facts of the case are set out in that opinion, as follows:
"The defendants, Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc., . . . and Terminix International Company…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- TranSouth Financial Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. VintsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Lee L. Saad Constr. Co. v. DPF Architects, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Allstar Homes, Inc. v. WatersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.