Legal Opinion

GADSDEN BUDWEISER DISTRIB. COMPANY INC. v. Holland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 29, 2001No. 1000350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

807 So.2d 528 (2001)

GADSDEN BUDWEISER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC.

v.

Monroe HOLLAND.

1000350.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 29, 2001.

Philip E. Miles and Larry H. Keener of Cusimano, Keener, Roberts, Kimberley & Miles, P.C., Gadsden, for appellant.

Donna F. McCurley and Thomas A. King of King & McCurley, P.C., Gadsden, for appellee.

HOUSTON, Justice.

Gadsden Budweiser Distributing Company, Inc. ("Gadsden Budweiser"), is the defendant in an action pending in the Etowah Circuit Court. It appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration.[1]

The plaintiff, Monroe Holland, was employed as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Briarcliff Nursing Home, Inc. v. TurcotteSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Ameriquest Mortg. Co., Inc. v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Scurtu v. International Student ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
  4. Managed Health Care Admin., Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  5. Cullman Sec. Servs., Inc. v. United Propane Gas, Inc. (Ex parte United Propane Gas, Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API