Legal Opinion

Petroskey v. Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1994No. Civ. 3-92-543PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff John E. Petroskey’s Objections (Doe. No. 47) to the January 5,1994 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson (Doc. No. 45). In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Erickson recommends granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.

A district court must make an independent determination of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which objection is made and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Piper Jaffray Companies, Inc. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  2. Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Leonard v. Mylex Corp. (In Re Northgate Computer Systems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. GRUNDTNER v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API