Legal Opinion

Hoggard v. City of Carlsbad Ex Rel. Forrest

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1995No. 15952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Judge.

1. The City of Carlsbad appeals from an adverse jury verdict for breach of contract in the sum of $456,000. Plaintiff sued the City for allegedly repudiating its contractual obligations to Plaintiff and thereby committing an anticipatory breach of that contract. The primary question on appeal is whether the evidence introduced by Plaintiff to establish repudiation was sufficient to create an issue of fact for the jury. We hold as a matter of law that a directed verdict should have been entered for the City on this issue. Therefore, we reverse on that claim and remand for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Jaramillo v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Richardson v. RutherfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Berry v. Federal Kemper Life Assur. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Gilmore v. DuderstadtNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Environmental Control, Inc. v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Strobel v. RuschDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API