Legal Opinion
C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall Partners
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1991No. 19490PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
This is a suit to recover excess rent claimed to have been paid under an amendment to a lease of retail space in a Las Cruces shopping mall. It was brought by C.R. Anthony Company (Anthony’s) against its landlord, Loretto Mall Partners, and against Dartford Company, N.V. Anthony’s originally negotiated and concluded the lease amendment with Dartford in 1982. Loretto purchased the shopping mall in 1984 and succeeded to Dartford’s interest. Defendants Loretto and Dartford will be referred to collectively as “the Mall.”
The trial court found the rental provisions of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Eskimo Pie Corporation v. Whitelawn Dairies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.