Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Duderstadt
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1998No. 17613PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
{1} This appeal and cross-appeal arise from a breach of contract action involving an agreement between Plaintiff James R. Gilmore (Gilmore) and Defendants Robert and Laura Duderstadt (the Duderstadts) to operate and purchase the Duderstadts’ fast-food restaurant business, Defendant Laubo Corporation (Laubo). On appeal, Gilmore contends that the trial court erred in (1) directing a verdict in favor of the Duderstadts and Laubo (collectively, Defendants) on his breach of contract claim relating to the purchase portion of the contract; (2) directing a verdict on his claim…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Paiz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Jones v. AbrianiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bourgeous v. Horizon Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Elm Ridge Exploration Company v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.