Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 31, 2011No. 2 CA-CR 2010-0392-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Richard Martinez challenges the trial court’s ruling on his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P. We grant review and, for the following reasons, conclude the court abused its discretion in finding Martinez’s claim of ineffective assistance of Rule 32 counsel either precluded or premature. We therefore remand the case for further proceedings.

Facts and Procedural Background

¶ 2 After plea negotiations held on the day his trial was scheduled to begin, Martinez pleaded guilty to the indictment against him,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State v. RosalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. State of Arizona v. Samuel Phillip ViramontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Bearup v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  3. State of Arizona v. Robert Taylor HardenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State of Arizona v. Rogelio Castro SolanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  5. State v. StuckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API