Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2006No. CR-05-0533-PRPublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to consider whether Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2.a(3) 1 precludes defendant Donna Jean Bennett’s claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and, if it does not, whether Bennett has stated a colorable claim. Bennett bases her ineffective assistance of counsel claim on appellate counsel’s failure to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on the causation element of her felony murder conviction. We hold that Bennett’s claim is not precluded and that she has stated a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. David A. Gray v. James GreerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. Travis Wade AmaralArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. RayesArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API