Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Samuel Phillip Viramontes

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 26, 2005No. 2 CA-CR 2004-0378-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, J.

¶ 1 Petitioner Samuel Viramontes challenges the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief brought pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., 17 A.R.S. Because we find that the trial court erred when it granted the state’s motion to dismiss the petition as untimely, we vacate the dismissal and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See State v. Watton, 164 Ariz. 323, 793 P.2d 80 (1990).

¶ 2 After a jury trial, Viramontes was convicted of first-degree murder. On May 24, 2000, the trial court sentenced him to natural life in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. ViramontesArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. RosalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. ViramontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State of Arizona v. Richard MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. State v. JonesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API