Legal Opinion

State v. Rosales

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 25, 2003No. 2 CA-CR 2002-0362-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, J.

¶ 1 Petitioner Adam Albert Rosales seeks review of the trial court’s dismissal of post-conviction relief proceedings brought pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., 17 AR.S., after the conclusion of his delayed appeal. Because we find that the trial court abused its discretion in summarily dismissing the proceeding based solely on the notice of post-conviction relief, without appointing counsel and before any petition was filed, we vacate that dismissal and remand the case for further proceedings. See State v. Watton, 164 Ariz. 323, 325, 793 P.2d 80, 82 (1990) (trial court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. State v. RoblesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Manning v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Osterkamp v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State of Arizona v. Darren Irving GoldinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API