Legal Opinion

State v. Herrera

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 17, 1995No. 1 CA-CR 94-0664-PRPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Daniel Mark Herrera (“defendant”) seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his petition for posi>conviction relief under Rule 32, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Rule 32”). We hold that a trial court has jurisdiction under Rule 32 to determine a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Furthermore, in this case, the trial court did not err in dismissing that claim nor in denying defendant’s allegations that (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, (2) perjured testimony had been introduced at trial, and (3) nondisclosure of a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Hollon v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API