Legal Opinion
Quinn v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 13, 1958PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
50 N.J. Super. 468 (1958)
142 A.2d 655
HAROLD QUINN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY, RESPONDENT, AND LONDON & LANCASHIRE INDEMNITY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, AND FIREMAN'S FUND INDEMNITY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 3, 1958.
Decided June 13, 1958.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Francis H. Pykon argued the cause for appellant Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company (Mr. Henry M. Grosman, attorney).
Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Russo v. United States Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Walker v. HogueIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- Bucuk v. Edward A. Zusi Brass FoundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Claim of Anderson v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ricciardi v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Osteen v. A. C. & S., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Johnnie's Produce Company v. Benedict & JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Kidder v. Coastal Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott PaperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.