Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Plaintiff entered the employ of defendant Goodwill Industries on December 20, 1933, and continued in its employ until August 4, 1934. He was seventy-two years of age on October 16, 1933. The parties are subject to the compensation act, and defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is the insurance carrier involved. Plaintiff was employed in repairing toys, and the evidence sustains the conclusion that his employment required him to stand upon his feet during most of the hours of work. During all of the time of his employment he was suffering from arteriosclerosis in the lower limbs and from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Schroeder & Daly Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bystrom Bros. v. JacobsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Merton Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Tews Lime & Cement Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Brown Shoe Company v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API