McCarthy Co. v. Boothe
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge. .The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. M. L. Graff, and Lawler, Allen & Van Dyke, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying the defendants ’ motion for a new trial.
The suit was brought upon an undertaking for attachment, in the statutory form, in the sum of $2,000, given by the defendants in the suit of one Humphris against the plaintiff herein. The facts shown by the findings are: The attachment was levied June 30, 1900, on five thousand four hundred shares of the Westlake Oil Company and seven thousand and sixty shares of the Wilson Oil Company, the property of the defendant in that case, now plaintiff. Judgment was rendered for the defendant in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Girard v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kimball v. Union Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1872
- Heath v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
- Coulson v. Panhandle Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Atlas Development Co. v. National Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Elsman v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933
- John T. Porter Co. v. Java Cocoanut Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Henkel v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.