Legal Opinion
Kimball v. Union Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1872No. 2,610PublishedCited by 20 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Niles, J.:
This is an original application in this Court for a mandamus to compel the respondent Scribner as President, and *174the respondent Rhodes, as Secretary of the Union Water Company, a corporation, to transfer to the relators on the books of the company certain shares of stock.
The petition avers that on the 6th day of April, 1870, one Regan was the owner of fourteen shares of the stock of the company, and the holder of a certificate transferable in the usual manner by indorsement and surrender; that on the 7th of April, 1870, Regan, by one Senter, his attorney in fact,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Asylum at Hartford v. President of the Phoenix BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
- Shipley v. Mechanics' BankNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- HighMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ralston v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- London, Paris & American Bank v. AronsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Durham v. Monumental Silver Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1880
- Mears v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State ex rel. Lyons v. Bank of ConceptionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.