Legal Opinion

State v. Shepherd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1949PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question posed is the sufficiency of the record to support the judgment.

It must be conceded that some dubiety arises in respect of the intent, scope and purpose of the hearing before the trial court as the transcript is contradictory on the subject. The defendant contends that his plea of nolo contendere was a conditional one with the ultimate issue of his guilt or innocence to be determined by the court. He now concedes that such procedure was ill advised and should be held for naught. S. v. Camby, 209 N.C. 50, 182 S.E. 715. The court seems to have had a different understanding of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. State v. . CambySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. McVaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Clark v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API