Legal Opinion

State v. . Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaricsoN, J.

The following are the exceptions and assignments of error made by defendant: “The defendant says that his Honor erred in his judgment in sentencing the defendant to work on the public highway of North Carolina for a period of six months, as set forth in Exception No. 1. His Honor erred in sentencing the defendant to work for a period of twelve months for temporary use of an automobile when no damage or misconduct, except the use of the automobile, as set forth in Exception No. 2.” Neither one can be sustained.

The defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere (1) for the larceny of an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . DriverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Commonwealth v. IngersollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. In Re StiersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. State v. . SwindellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Clark v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. StansburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API